🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to pass a bill raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the state level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers show that governments around the world are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.