🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. While the character's name a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per a journalist who researched his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events said the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.